Fox News' Coverage of the Uvalde Shooting Was Sickening

The decade following the 2012 massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary has proved that the Republican Party’s infatuation with guns is stronger than any reservations it may have about children being slaughtered. Conservative gun worship has been reaffirmed in the wake of shooting after shooting, and it shouldn’t be surprising that after at least 21 people, including at least 19 children, were killed in Uvalde, Texas, on Tuesday by a teenager who bought two assault rifles on his 18th birthday, Republican politicians and right-wing media chose guns over the nation’s children.

The reaction was especially egregious on Fox News, which decided to put bloviating pundits front and center as information about what happened became public, ignore even the most basic tenets of journalism in favor of reckless speculation, and bring on a steady procession of “experts” to offer harebrained solutions for the epidemic of people with guns killing people in schools. Here are a few examples of what the network broadcast to millions of Americans trying to make sense of what happened in Uvalde:

Pundits speculating recklessly, with a dash of racism

Fox News has a breaking news team, but they instead opted to let entertainment-focused pundits Jesse Waters and Judge Jeanine break down what happened for viewers. They didn’t know what happened, of course, but that didn’t stop them from trying to figure it out on the air.

Judge Jeanine later criticized people who are frightened of people with guns. “People today, many of them, are intimidated, they are triggered if there is someone with a gun,” she said in addressing the idea of armed guards at schools. “They are frightened. That’s this new narrative. When you see a gun you should be frightened instead of appreciating what they are doing for you.”

Judge Jeanine wasn’t the only Fox News personality to bash the idea that kids may be “triggered” by the presence of guns in schools. “Quite frankly, who cares how the kids feel?” one host asked.

Guests suggesting schools should be booby-trapped

The only serious solution is to make it more difficult to obtain guns, but since that’s off the table, you get people very earnestly proposing things like “man traps” triggered by a “trip wire” that “traps the shooter like a rat.”

It’s the parents’ fault

The “man trap” idea is one example of the conservative idea that America’s school should essentially resemble prisons, fortified with various protective mechanisms and covered with people with guns ready to stop other people with guns from killing children. Laura Ingraham lamented on Tuesday that more schools haven’t been outfitted with bulletproof glass and other barriers.

One of her guests, the father of one of the victims at Parkland High School, said it’s the parents’ “responsibility where you send your children to school,” and that parents should be scouting schools to determine if they can be easily accessed by a shooter.

One guest even suggested parents should be more responsible about what they’re buying their children. The guest said that instead buying “toys and games” for children, parents should be spending their money on paying companies to do threat assessments of schools and buying “colorful and beautiful” “ballistic blankets” to hang up on the wall.

It’s the schools’ fault

“What it comes down to is nobody was there to protect those children,” one guest of Jesse Waters said. “Whether there was a school resource officer somewhere else in that school district, they were not there to protect those little seven-, eight-, and nine-year-olds. So wherever the resources come from, this is a priority. We have to stop letting those schools be gun-free zones. The bad guys know that nobody is there to protect the children.”

“Someone in Texas needs to be held accountable for leaving that school to be a shooting gallery,” Watters replied. “There has to be an adult there with a weapon to protect those kids.

It’s the kids’ fault

Jesse Watters and a guest started batting around the fact that the shooter reached out to a girl on Instagram ahead of the shooting. She and other kids and family members should have said something, they argued.

“We have to do a better job. If you see something, say something,” said Chad Ayers, VP of the Proactive Response Group. “I honestly think that in this day in age, kids are afraid of being the school snitch. That’s got to go out the window.”

Ayers added that teachers need to be better trained to combat anyone who might burst into the school and start massacring their students.

It’s the fault of … well, something

“We, as a society, have a problem,” said Bret Baier. “Wherever you want to put the blame. We, as a society, have a problem, and that is clear.”

“Something’s going on out there,” Laura Ingraham added. “There’s something happening to our national psyche or to families or to mental illness. I don’t know what it is, but there’s something very corrosive happening in our culture.”

There should be more, not fewer, guns at schools

The most common suggestion whenever something like this happens is that there needs to be more, not fewer, guns at schools. Just about every figure in conservative media has suggested increasing the amount of guns at schools, lamenting that “politics” — not that it’s a horrible idea that wouldn’t solve anything — is preventing this from happening.

“I’d much rather have law abiding citizens armed and trained so that they can respond when something like this happens, because it’s not going to be the last time,” Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said on Newsmax, acknowledging the slaughter of children at schools is now an intractable part of life in America.

“We can potentially arm and train and prepare teachers and other administrators to respond quickly, because the reality is we don’t have the resources to have law enforcement at every school,” Paxton added on Fox News.

One of the problems is that officers were outside of the elementary school in Uvalde on Tuesday. Sgt. Erick Estrada of the Texas Department of Public Safety told CNN that the shooter was engaged by law enforcement — precisely the good guys with guns Paxton and every other gun-loving conservative point to as the solution — before he entered the school. He was still able to kill 21 people, including 19 children.

Source: Read Full Article